You are detectives trying to solve the murder of Amy LaTour. You have looked at all of the clues and have examined all of the evidence. As a team, explain your theory of who the murderer was. Use modals of past certainty to determine your answer. Tell us who it could or might have been, who it couldn't have been, who it had to have been (must have been), and why it could or couldn't have been them, etc...
Publish one answer per team.
She must not have been shot. Because there is no blood. She should have been violent struggled. Because I can see her scarf very tight on her neck and beaten on her cheek.
ReplyDeleteIt chould not have been Louis. Because the jewelry is still there. also she might have been close with all the suspects, But we think Henry or Celeste. Because she loved joe so we think It should not have been Joe. There are so many of Joe's pictures around the room, So it should have been Henry. Because he was her boyfriend too, so he got jealous.
First, I think Louis Spanker couldn't have been the murderer, because the jewelry on table haven't been moved. It must not have been Joe Wonty too, because Amy put his photo and flowers in her bedroom, it means their relationship was flexible. Henry Willy might have been the murderer, as the last boyfriend of Amy, he has a motive, but I don't think he is the murderer. First, an mirror on the table and in front of Amy, if someone come in, she can see the person first. Amy hold an comb on her left hand, it means she didn't guard against the coming person, while the person was coming, she was still making up. If the coming person was the last boyfriend, I think she wouldn't still making up, at least she wouldn't use bake forward to the him. The bird was strangled after Amy's death, because if the bird death before, Amy would find dangerous. She and the bird both didn't guard against the murderer, it means the person always in her bedroom, so I think the murderer must have been the maid, Celeste.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading the story we have concluded the following:
ReplyDelete-The burglar couldn't have done it, because it wouldn't be logical to leave jewelry in Amy's room.
-By watching the given picture, we noticed some flowers and a photo of one of her boyfriends(Joe) so this shows they must have had a good relationship, and no reasons to commit this horrible crime!
-Willy(the other boyfriend) might have done it, because she had all this pictures of Joe, but if he was upset about Amy's infidelity, Willy would have at least broken the vase with the flowers before killing the girl.
-Celeste must have been the murder, she would be the only one who would killed Amy without caring about her jewelry, flowers or other, excepting the canary. We believe that because of it's singing she might have been annoyed by the poor bird so she also got rid of it.
Yichen, Abldurahman & Mariana(:
After considering all the suspects. I'd say that Louis couldn't have been the murder because he is a burglar and the jewelry wasn't stolen. It can be seen from the picture and the bouquet that joe and the victim were in a good relationship before the crime. Therefore, i'd say that Joe couldn't have been the killer. Even though Willy may have been the killer, there are some evidence stand against the saying. if Willy was the killer, he would destroy the bouquet and break the picture instead of killing the canary. At this point, we can infer that Celeste must have been the killer. The mirror's reflection shows us the the door isn't closed. If the murder was from outside the house,he/she would close the door and ran away.
ReplyDelete